Friday, November 11, 2011

Are you preparing your staff for the job that is coming at them?


Here is a interesting and thought-provoking exchange between Jon Stewart and Mario Batali about bosses who yell at, and demean, their staff. Stewart has asked Batali about the infamous Gordon Ramsey, whose insulting tirades are the staple of a certain reality show I'd rather not name:

Stewart:    [When] you’re at your restaurants, are you Gordon Ramsey? Are you yelling at these people in the kitchen?

Batali:    I am decidedly not Gordon Ramsey. Although, I respect him for finding his voice in whatever world it had to be.

Stewart:  Why can’t he use his inside voice?  Why must he always use his outside, angry voice?

Batali:     You have no idea how complicated that inside voice may be...that’s yelling at him from inside. Generally, cooks that yell at other cooks, or chefs that yell at other cooks, are expressing their own self-loathing for not having prepared their staff to do the job they knew was coming at them.

Stewart:   Hey Gordon Ramsey, maybe it’s time you took a look in a pot of sauce named you.


With this in mind, reflect back upon the times you have been angry and disappointed with your staff and colleagues and ask yourself, "Did I do everything in my power to prepare them for the job I knew was coming at them?" In other words, did you do your best to help them succeed?

'nuff said.

And here's the full interview. The segment cited above begins at the 3 minute, 30 second mark:


The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Mario Batali
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical Humor & Satire BlogThe Daily Show on Facebook

Friday, October 21, 2011

A Handbook for Micro-Managers?

This is just for fun (or maybe I'm trying to make a serious point). A friend recently went into a rather extensive rant about a boss who happens to be a micro-manager  Which got me to wondering: how does one learn to be a micro-manager? Is there a handbook these people use? That led me to imagine a special edition of the classic management book, The One Minute Manager.



Why not a special edition for the micro-manager in your life?


Thursday, October 20, 2011

Making Sense of Innovation: Three Questions to Ask Yourself



A lot has been written about innovation - perhaps too much. As a topic and as a practical matter, it can be hard to your head around it. To that end, here are three questions to ask yourself as you try to figure out how make innovation happen in your organization. 

1. Which "pathway" to innovation is best for your organization? 

It turns out there are a number of pathways to innovation (as illustrated below). The trick is understanding which will make the most sense for your kind of organization. 
  • The "Expertise" Pathway:  Developing superior knowledge and expertise to gain leverage. Consulting firms, when they are able to establish a clear intellectual leadership in a particular field, are a good example.
  • The "Re-mixing Common Elements Uniquely" Pathway: Innovation is realized by how an a company packages or presents its products or services. In its heyday, for example, The Gap's clothing was not impressively unique, but its method of merchandising and presenting were.
  • The "Unmet Customer Needs" Pathway: This reflects the ability to match products with unfilled consumer needs. Church & Dwight, maker of Arm & Hammer baking soda, has expanded it sales by finding new, unfilled needs for its sodium bicarbonate: toothpaste, carpet freshener, and mouthwash.
  • The "Leveraging Functional Excellence" Pathway: The ability to execute, consistently, a certain function better than one's competitors. The Ritz-Carlton defines functional excellence for customer service in the hotel industry while Procter & Gamble has mastered the skills to excel in consumer packaged-goods marketing.
  • The "Pure Imagination" Pathway: Using imagination to see possibilities that are not always logically evident. Walt Disney Company has given the lexicon of marketing a whole new term - "imagineering."

2. Do you have a well-defined approach to Creative Problem Solving?

It is not sufficient to simply say, "let's get together and brainstorm a solution" and expect consistently good results from your innovation efforts. Staff needs to be in-sync about how to proceed with Creative Problem Solving. .For that reason, a number of organizations train their staff in the Osborne-Parnes Creative Problem Solving Model, which consists of six well-defined steps:
  1. Determine the objectives or desired outcome.
  2. Assemble the facts. 
  3. Define the problem that needs solving.
  4. Generate ideas for possible solutions.
  5. Determine the best ideas leading to a solution.
  6. Determine strategies to make sure the solution will be accepted and implemented within the organization. .

    3. How will you manage the team?

    Execution is the name of the game, here. This requires a framework for managing a team working on an innovation project. One approach is to use the the C.A.R.E. Profile® -- an instrument that identifies five key roles in innovative team performance:
    1. Creator: Generates original concepts, goes beyond the obvious, and sees the big picture. Hands off tasks to an Advancer.
    2. Advancer: Recognizes new opportunities, develops ways to promote ideas, and moves toward implementation. Hands off tasks to a Refiner.
    3. Refiner: Challenges and analyzes ideas to detect potential problems and may hand plans back to an Advancer or Creator before handing off tasks to an Executor.
    4. Executor: Lays the groundwork for implementation, manages the details, and moves the process to completion.
    5. Facilitator: Works throughout the process to ensure tasks are handed off to the right people at the right time.
    The C.A.R.E. Profile enables a manager to choose the right people to fill each of these roles so a team has a balanced mix of skills needed for success.

    Related articles:

    Tuesday, October 18, 2011

    Project Build: Organizing for Creativity and Performance


    A few years ago I developed a fun team building exercise called Project Build. The exercise explores two different approaches of organizing people into teams and makes an important point about the best way to organize teams for creativity and performance. It's been a big success every time I have used it. Feel free to use it!

    Related articles: 

    Monday, August 29, 2011

    Avoid Emotional Triggers in Chapter Relations

     

    I have written an article, Avoid Emotional Triggers in Chapter Relations, for ASAE's Component Relations E-Newsletter. It presents a list of emotional triggers (i.e., behaviors by headquarters' staff) that can frustrate chapter leaders.

    And this raises the question: How does one respond when emotionally triggered? Here are two approaches toward speaking skillfully in such a situation:

    Using these techniques, and training your volunteers to use them, can significantly reduce tension and conflict between an association's HQ and its chapters.

    'nuff said!

    Click here for more articles about Chapter Relations.

    Friday, August 26, 2011

    A Decision Making Primer

    Is your board having trouble making decisions? Here are some questions to ask yourself.